Back to Papers
American Gas Association — Report

The Impact of Distributed Generation on Local Distribution Companies

American Gas Association
Engineering
Report
Classification

Topics & metadata

FolderElectrical Engineering
Sub-domainElectrical Engineering
TypeTechnical Report
Year2000
StatusUnknown
LevelExpert
Summary

This report analyzes the impact of distributed generation technologies on local distribution companies, covering their value proposition, barriers, and benefits allocation.

Copyright & official sources

This page provides educational summaries and key takeaways. For the official, complete paper text and usage rights, we encourage you to purchase or access the original publication through authorized channels. This supports the authors and publishers who make this research possible.

Research summary

Key Insights: The Impact of Distributed Generation on Local Distribution Companies

Distributed generation (DG) presents both opportunities and challenges for local distribution companies (LDCs) that require a re-evaluation of grid planning and operational strategies.

Research Focus

This report addresses the evolving landscape of distributed generation and its multifaceted impact on local distribution companies. It aims to provide LDCs with a comprehensive understanding of DG's value proposition, the barriers hindering its adoption, and how the associated benefits should be assessed and allocated. The research involved analyzing various DG technologies, market dynamics, and policy implications to inform strategic decision-making.

What the Research Found

Finding 1: DG Offers Diverse Value Streams

DG technologies, ranging from cogeneration to peak shaving units, provide significant economic value by reducing energy costs, enhancing reliability, and offering grid support services. Understanding these specific value elements is crucial for LDCs to engage effectively with DG stakeholders.

Finding 2: Interconnection and Utility Service Charges are Key Barriers

Complex interconnection standards, along with utility charges for standby, backup, and exit services, represent significant hurdles to DG integration. Streamlining these processes and clarifying cost structures is essential for facilitating DG deployment.

Finding 3: Benefit Valuation and Allocation Require Careful Consideration

Quantifying the benefits derived from DG, such as avoided transmission and distribution costs, and determining fair allocation mechanisms among stakeholders, is critical for equitable integration. Issues like net metering policies directly influence the economic viability of DG for various customer classes.

Why It Matters for Practice

This research fundamentally challenges the traditional utility business model by highlighting how DG can alter load profiles and impact revenue streams. For engineers and designers, it necessitates a shift in grid modernization efforts, focusing on bidirectional power flow and enhanced grid intelligence. It also opens opportunities for LDCs to develop new service offerings around DG integration and management.

Putting It Into Practice

Based on these findings, professionals should consider:

  • System Impact Studies: Redesigning interconnection studies to accurately assess the technical impacts of DG on local grids, including voltage stability and protection coordination.
  • Tariff Revisions: Evaluating and potentially revising standby, backup, and exit charges to reflect the actual costs and benefits of DG integration.
  • Benefit-Cost Analysis: Developing robust methodologies to quantify the system-wide benefits of DG (e.g., avoided infrastructure upgrades, reduced line losses) and exploring equitable allocation mechanisms.
  • Policy Engagement: Actively participating in policy discussions related to net metering, interconnection rules, and market structures to ensure fair treatment of all grid participants.

Limitations to Note

The report's findings are based on the market conditions and technological understanding prevalent at the time of its publication (July 2000). Therefore, practitioners should consider how subsequent technological advancements and market evolution may influence these conclusions.